1. The matter was coming for assessment of interest. Counsel for the defendant raised a
preliminary objection and argued that they had an agreement with the claimant to the effect
that the loan was to be pegged in dollars to overcome the issue of interest. Counsel for the
claimant has argued that the correspondence if anything was on without prejudice basis
and that anything that happened between them was in furtherance of their desire to have
the debt settled within a reasonable time. I have not before me seen any material admissible
enough to warrant the argument of Counsel for the defendant. The argument is from the
totality of the issues unfaithful and impotent as it comes. This will soon become apparent.